VS HUMAN PROFESSIONALS

AI vs Human Translation: Tested Against Professionals (2026)

FAMILIAR RESEARCHUPDATED ALL ARTICLES

ABSTRACT

Familiar matches first-pass expert professional translators: 100.3% of their quality, averaged across French, Chinese, Hindi, and Indonesian, scored blind against expert reference edits from WMT24++ (August 2026).

The test

100.3%

of expert human translation quality

FRENCH, CHINESE, HINDI, INDONESIAN · FIRST PASS FOR EXPERT PROFESSIONAL TRANSLATORS
ALL-IN

one Familiar render: the translation, the speaker's own voice, the scene audio, and the lip-sync, delivered up to 4K with a true 5.1 or stereo mix

TRANSLATION ALONE IS WHAT THE PROFESSIONAL RATE BUYS

Each source segment was translated twice, once by Familiar and once by a professional human translator; both versions were judged blind against expert reference edits.

THE SCORE
HOW IT WAS JUDGEDEach language's result is Familiar's relative score against the first-pass professional, with the professional fixed at 100%.
THE HUMAN SIDE IS NOT OURS
HOW IT WAS JUDGEDThe professional translations and expert reference edits come from WMT24++ (paper), the public evaluation set extending WMT24 to 55 languages, produced and post-edited by professional linguists.
“FIRST PASS”
HOW IT WAS JUDGEDThe professional's first deliverable, before a second linguist's revision round; it is what published per-word rates buy.
THE TEST SET · WMT24++ (GOOGLE) · DEUTSCH ET AL. · ARXIV:2502.12404

Results by language

FIG. 01 · RELATIVE SCORE VS THE FIRST-PASS EXPERT PROFESSIONAL · DASHED LINE = THE PROFESSIONAL'S 100%
French100.0%
Chinese98.2%
Hindi103.3%
Indonesian99.6%
95% RANGES IN THE TABLE BELOW
RELATIVE SCORE AND 95% RANGE, PER LANGUAGE · PROFESSIONAL = 100%
LanguageRelative score95% range
French100.0%97.0–105.4
Chinese98.2%95.6–100.0
Hindi103.3%100.4–108.5
Indonesian99.6%97.6–103.2
Average100.3%–

Read the ranges, not the decimals: a range that spans 100 is a statistical tie with the professional.

Averaged, 100.3% is a match, not a win.
FOUR LANGUAGES · FRENCH, CHINESE, HINDI, INDONESIAN · RUN AUGUST 2026

The whole job, at published prices

Full human dubbing, translation plus voice, runs $70 to $150 per finished minute, so it isn't usable for most of the world: even top productions dub only a few languages because of the cost, the people and the time, and smaller productions, shows and vertical dramas don't dub at all. Translation at published per-word rates ($0.15 to $0.30 per word) is only the first line item; the published rate cards for the rest:

PRICE CONTEXT IN US DOLLARS, PER TARGET LANGUAGE
OptionPer finished minuteFor 60 minutes
Published human translation + review$10 median $11.95 mean$600 median $717 mean
Published human dubbing packages (voice, direction, mix)$39–$94 ~$60 midpoint$2,340–$5,640 ~$3,600 midpoint
Full human dubbing, translation plus voice$70–$150$4,200–$9,000
Premium studio dubbingFrom $128From $7,680
FIG. 02 · A 60-MINUTE VIDEO INTO ONE LANGUAGE · MEDIANS AND RANGE MIDPOINTS
TRANSLATION$600
VOICE PACKAGE~$3,600
FULL HUMAN DUB~$6,600

SOURCES & MATH

  • $10 median / $11.95 mean: 11 target languages, Netflix's published rate card.
  • $39–$94 packages: Voquent; from $128: Gotham Lab (references below).
  • Full human dubbing = translation plus voice.
  • Published prices, not identical workflows; rates vary by language, talent, studio, revisions, and volume.

The same translation, inside a finished dub

This study scores translation text alone; the full head-to-head on finished dubs from Familiar is Familiar vs ElevenLabs Dubbing: Two Paired Studies.

54.7%

fewer important translation errors than ElevenLabs' newest Dubbing v2 (Alpha)

29 VS 64 · 111 PAIRED DUBS · MANDARIN, SPANISH, JAPANESE
ElevenLabsElevenLabsElevenLabsTHEIR DOCS, READ OCTOBER 30, 2026

Editing the translation means their old model.

On ElevenLabs' current Dubbing v2, in alpha, editing the translation and regenerating the audio through the API is for their Enterprise plans only. Their full editor, Dubbing Studio, is "only available via the v1 model" and "in maintenance mode", in their words. Dubbing v1 is the model our 418-pair study measured, and its output is mono.

+27.8%

FAMILIAR CLOSER TO THE REAL SPEAKER · ALL 11 LANGUAGES

261%

ELEVENLABS MORE BACKGROUND ERROR · THE MUSIC, THE AMBIENCE

+243.7%

FAMILIAR ON LAUGHTER AND REACTION SHAPE

ELEVENLABS DUBBING V1 · 418 PAIRED OUTPUTS · 11 LANGUAGES · AUGUST 5, 2026Read the study Their docs

Where professionals come in

A professional brings what no metric captures: transcreation of wordplay, legal and brand review, accountability for a single high-stakes document. For spoken video at catalogue scale, human dubbing isn't usable: even top productions dub only a few languages because of the cost, the people and the time.

DO NOT TRANSLATE LIST
WHAT IT DOESNames and catchphrases stay exactly as spoken.
REVIEW SCREEN
WHAT IT DOESEvery video pauses before render; any line can be edited.

To test the translation on your own footage: How to Run an AI Dubbing Pilot (2026).

REFERENCES

  1. [1]Familiar vs ElevenLabs benchmark: full results, intervals, and listening examples
  2. [2]WMT24++ dataset: the professional translations and expert reference edits
  3. [3]WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialects (paper)
  4. [4]Netflix Post Production: published translation rate card
  5. [5]Voquent: how much does dubbing cost?
  6. [6]Gotham Lab: dubbing services (premium studio rates)
  7. [7]ATA 2025 Compensation Survey (interpreter rates)
  8. [8]Smartling: Translation rates -- how much does translation cost?
  9. [9]Tomedes: Translation rates and why translation prices vary

Multimodal Translation

Familiar Labs builds generationally better dubbing with a Multimodal Localization Decision Model (MLDM), the first foundation model for multimodal translation: one model decides what to localize across text, audio and visual, and shows you the choices. Your voice and lips, carried into new languages. They're a team of 7 with PhDs, backed by Samsung, RedBird, Gold House. Our mission